It’s kind of refreshing to have self defense as an option when games of this genre usually rely on feeling defenseless to instill terror.
Sorry, I didn’t get it from the description. What would you say is the genre of this game? Doesn’t sound like walking simulator
I’m too noob to understand it all but the way I see it, the core is not about using Some instead of iter::slice but what is inside.
I understand this all is in context of Intel Software Guard Extensions about which I know nothing at all, and “UserRef states that userspace may always write to backing memory at any time, and that even &mut UserRef<T> is not exclusive”. So it seems that the design of UserRef is basically against Rust principles (“userspace may always write to backing memory”). So when the iterator is just a wrapper over slice::Iter, the code in next() relies on Rust’s principles which don’t align with how UserRef is supposed to behave. The proposal is to walk over ptr “manually” and return it (cast to UserRef) instead of constructing new UserRef from what slice::Iter would return in that next().map(|e| UserRef::from_ptr(e)).
But does
+pub struct Iter<'a, T: 'a + UserSafe> {
+ ptr: *const T,
really mean that one can happily cast that ptr to UserRef?
What is PhantomData and how/why using it makes any difference, when it’s not being changed during iteration?
Is the UserRefdesign sound or was only a workaround some problem?
building within certain (spatial?) limitations
Cliff Empire might interest you but I don’t remember if it had livability mechanic
solving problems or something
First Frostpunk
within certain (spatial?) limitations (…) a bit more focus on individual buildings and livability
Surviving Mars?
Not a city builder, but maybe Oxygen not Included would be your match?
Ohhh. That might actually look nice. I haven’t thought about using it in that direction
There’s a lot more to what destroyed hanging out in the pub than scheduling
For sure but even if you switch out computer games to board games, that is still not the same. People moved, a lot of games need space and hauling the box, etc
In school we used to have breaks, we were hanging out just because of that. Now most often we don’t even work together anymore. Unless one has a job that forces them to come to the office or is one of that ~1% of the workforce that prefers to, and can have a chat at the water stand, I think for many people the reality is that if not for online games, they wouldn’t hang out with anyone anymore
You know where there term “AAA” comes from, right?
Games used to be a niche - made by gamers for gamers. Now it’s gotten more mainstream so we have more industry around it. Good games aren’t gone, just don’t get advertised, same as everything else that is worthwhile
As for social aspects of the games, I don’t agree with your take. We don’t have time to be hanging out in pubs every weekend anymore. Hopping in VC to do some “base building” requires less scheduling
Which one is it in the end?
https://piefed.zip/c/globalnews/p/1358564/china-stocks-suffer-panic-selling-as-tariff-war-escalates
That’s how the community plays it. 3 being rather on the low-end of what I’ve heard of
And if you know the game mechanics and play enough you can buy subscription of one month with in-game money
fixing a smartphone is not the same as modifying systems that keep the lights on for our country
From what I’ve seen around, apart from QC and cut corners, that is bull
I can’t report because I haven’t validated them yet… I’m not going to send [the Linux kernel maintainers] potential slop
That’s worth pointing out IMO
Forks are a central part of the open-source ecosystem and are expressly intended to enable further development, adaptation, and also alternative governance models.
Yes, but the immovability of *GPL licenses is what protects the projects from exploitation. OO put an addition to that license that the name is part of the copyrighted thing. So if for whatever reason the work done by NC is not being merged into upstream, or is not being fast enough, there should be two OO. One from OO and a fork from NC. If the code-bases drift apart, well, now we have two incompatible OnlyOffices. In that case those additions might have been a dumb idea. But I think we can’t afford to have exceptions from enforceability of the license
I don’t know about good, I haven’t tested any of them yet. But from my “list to check out” that is not the already mentioned jitsi (I’m mostly focusing on self-hosting but some of those have public/hosted plans too):
🤨 just a few days ago - maybe up to two weeks, there was a post somewhere here linking to article that said teachers are noticing positive effects on scores. It might have been Australia, though