• lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t see the problem. It’s from a company called “Dragon Lawyers”. If it was idk “Flower Lawyers” they could put a flower with a tie or something. What is it with those snowflakes not being able to handle a decent watermark. It’s not like it’s somehow offensive.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly pretty sick dragon. Great PR. But yeah definitely they should use some sort of cryptographic signature, not (on its own at least) an image watermark like this haha

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Judge should be fired. Does the dragon somehow change the words on the page? If the watermarks affects the ability for screen readers, then fine. Otherwise, the judge is clearly unable to form an unbiased opinion and is willing to allow something irrelevant like appearance bias their cases.