• velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    The worst part about virgins writing erotica isn’t that they omit the awkward parts - it’s the bad anatomy. No, no you cannot force a penis past the cervix and into the uterus.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well I’m sure it’s possible (if length allows), why not?

      Might as well jam it in her eye for all the enjoyment she’ll get out of it.

      And maybe call and ambulance as you’ve surely damaged something.

    • tr0xy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I know a hentai artists, who draws fallopian tube penetration a lot. But the settings are generally surreal and don’t care for realistic anatomy. (Definitely also contains eye and ear penetration; and once somebody taking a still connected eyeball into their mouth)

  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    “It’s lower than you think,” ”it doesn’t have to hurt the first time,” and “orgasms don’t work like that,” all spring to mind as obvious tells when a virgin is writing smut that aren’t awkward parts of sex.

  • maria [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    got no idea what a smut is but… honestly… erectile dysfunction fetisist… i kinda get it. kinda.

    but more in a cutie kinda way and less in a “woah this so shmeggsy” kinda way.

  • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    also there’s never enough farting/queefing. pretty much every time I’ve had penetrative sex, no matter who tops or which hole we used, some air got pushed inside and came out with comical effect, either during or right after or both.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      tbf, omissions are less egregious, as text only includes what is relevant, not every little detail. If it doesn’t ruin the moment or contribute something important to it, why bother mentioning it? What is more telling are details that shouldn’t be there.