Beep@lemmus.orgBanned to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoShrinkflationi.imgur.comimagemessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1217file-text
arrow-up1217imageShrinkflationi.imgur.comBeep@lemmus.orgBanned to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square24linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLumidaub@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoYes. And 32 ounces != 28 ounces. They’re absurdly using “a litre” and “a 32 ounce bottle” kind of like “a serving”.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoOhh wait I get it. “A liter [bottle] shrank to…”
minus-squareanyhow2503@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoYes, the issue is the wording. The american version shrinks a bottle of certain volume, the metric version shrinks the unit of measurement.
minus-squareanyhow2503@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoCould be surrealist humor if we ignore the alternative american version
The metric version makes no sense
Less than the Freedom units one?
Yes.
How so?
1 liter != 0.9 liter
Yes. And 32 ounces != 28 ounces.
They’re absurdly using “a litre” and “a 32 ounce bottle” kind of like “a serving”.
Ohh wait I get it. “A liter [bottle] shrank to…”
Yes, the issue is the wording. The american version shrinks a bottle of certain volume, the metric version shrinks the unit of measurement.
Could be surrealist humor if we ignore the alternative american version