• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    some $2k beats a console and you get more games, cheaper price, and can do whatever you want with it

    so if you’re already getting a computer, it just makes sense

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      This argument made more sense 20 years ago. Now there’s a lot more people who just don’t need a desktop.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        idk about that. I have both and I still prefer using the desktop at home because I can get a much nicer performance out of it than connecting an external display to the laptop. Even for ordinary things like watching a YT video it makes a difference.

        people might not need it, but no one who’s not a game developer needs a console either

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          “Needs” is a tricky word, here.

          People want to play games. If they don’t need a desktop otherwise, it’s fine to choose a console for games. The number of people who need a desktop is a lot less than it was 20 years ago.