ExLisper Site
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months ago

Amid Chicago deportation campaign, Trump authorizes 300 National Guard troops over Pritzker's objections

www.wbez.org

external-link
message-square
21
link
fedilink
124
external-link

Amid Chicago deportation campaign, Trump authorizes 300 National Guard troops over Pritzker's objections

www.wbez.org

silence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months ago
message-square
21
link
fedilink
Amid Chicago deportation campaign, Trump authorizes 300 National Guard troops over Pritzker’s objections
www.wbez.org
external-link
President Donald Trump's move comes after Gov. JB Pritzker said earlier this week the Department of Homeland Security requested deployment of 100 military troops to Illinois “for the protection of ICE personnel and facilities.”
  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    Blue states need to cease operation of their national guard units. Transfer all personnel to the state guards. The national guard units can be activated by the president; the state guards can’t.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      I will note that there is a huge financial incentive to not do that. Instead, they’re challenging the federal deployments in court, with some success

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well I’m sorry we had to democracy die. Doing otherwise would have been too expensive.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Actually launching a civil war is really really bad. I expect to see it done only after everything else fails

          • FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, better to just let the armed goons do whatever they want.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Where did you get this odd civil war idea?

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              What exactly do you call a situation where state militias are using force to prevent armdd federal employees dressed in military-style uniforms from attacking the people?

              • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s not what I suggested at all. I specifically suggested disbanding the national guard units all together and just moving them to the state guard units. You could even let them keep their own command structure. Just basically shuffling state-level personnel around so that the president can’t take control of it.

              • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Anything but civil.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.71K users / day
  • 3.8K users / week
  • 7.05K users / month
  • 13.9K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 26.6K subscribers
  • 6.95K Posts
  • 76.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org